Ecclesiastes (Tape 28)
[brackets for comments]
        
        Vanity has been described as accepting a false   picture of self and of one's abilities. Of course, we all have somewhat of a   false picture of our abilities until we consider them. We are constantly   'suggested to" that we have these abilities; and unless one is extremely   heedful, extremely capable of paying attention, and sees the necessity of it,   one quickly is caught back into vanity, of believing one has abilities one does   not have; such as, "I can walk." Really only X knows how to walk the body. I can   report to X that I want to go to the door and open the door and suddenly we see   the walking and of course, experiencing it [the walking] the vanity says, "I am   doing it." Then we defend the idea that we are doing it with great effort; and,   of course, that is called pride. 
        
        There is a very ancient book called   Ecclesiastes that talks much about this vanity; and we will suggest that for   this week you might become acquainted somewhat with the Book of Ecclesiastes. We   will give some reading from it and some discussion; but we will be looking at it   in the light of the teaching and how it applies, and we may give some little   points about the book. Ecclesiastes was said to have been written by a teacher   in a school. Now one of the ancient schools was called the House of Israel. It   had several different branches. Then the House of Israel was followed by the   House of Solomon, and it had several branches. And then as the schools died out,   each teacher being a little farther from the original clarity, the school died   out and was left with the ritual. We find it picked up again, the story of this   school when the Scribes, and Pharisees were running it. and the Sadducees which   had turned it into purely a ritualistic method. They did the ritual, but for no   known reason as to why.
        
        For instance, one of the rituals was "the washing   of hands." One washed one's hands before eating, representing that one was   cleansed of contamination before handling food. Now, this was used to remind,   not only for health reasons and for genteel reasons, but was also as   reminder--to remind one that the mind grasps ideas; therefore, is considered to   be like the physical hands except that the mind picks up certain suggestions,   opinions and concepts, and that one was to have the mind, or the inner being,   washed of any contamination of suggestion from that day before one took hold of   an idea and began to work with it because ideas that have been experimented   with is what builds the spiritual body. So these ideas that the mind has   grasped are raw food; and if they were taken by the hands of the mind that has   been contaminated with suggestion, then that food will be contaminated and will   be injurious to the spiritual body. 
        
        So as time went on, all was   forgotten about taking in the spiritual food, the spiritual ideas, and was only   left as a ritual to perform - to wash the hands before one ate. And, of course,   the great Messiah tried to point this out by many different means of even eating   with unwashed hands to point out to the people the parallel that they were   taking in contaminated spiritual food without washing their hands while they   were making a great to-do about having their hands washed before they eat   literal food. He told them what came from without did not trample them under or   defile them, but what defiled a man arose from within--in the inner state of   man, "the inner hands" that takes in concepts without checking as to whether one   is full of vanity or greed or pride or is still flitting around with "ideals".   In other words, everyday one must "wash one's hands" before one takes in "food"   and the hands that are referred to, of course, is the spiritual aspect of man   [the awareness function] that grasps an idea and begins to accept it without   experimentation because it appeals to some contamination that has penetrated the   mind or the "hands of the mind" of this day.
        
        Now Ecclesiastes said,   starting in about the12th verse, 
        
"I Ecclesiastes, was King over Israel   in Jerusalem." 
        
        In other words, he announces that he was the head of the   school of the House of Israel in the city of Jerusalem. There were other schools   other places and somebody else was master over those schools. Now, he's called a   King. It's easy to take those words from master to king, etc. He tells about his   growth from the time of being a student until he was king. The fact that he   tells what happens doesn't mean he was already the king when he started doing   this, but he tells his story of his efforts as a student, and what he observed.   We'll find that while the words may be somewhat different, the ideas are exactly   the things that we go through today.
        
        So he starts, "I, Ecclesiastes, was   King over Israel in Jerusalem, and (now this is before he was King over Israel   [head of the school]) I proposed in my mind to seek and search out wisely   concerning all things that are done under the sun." 
        
        Don't we all do that   somewhere in our way, possibly when in college or before we got out of college   or shortly afterwards or maybe even in high school? Some of us even earlier   decided that we were capable of searching out all things wisely. We felt we were   already capable of being able to discern without any self-knowing that which was   better done under the sun. We figured we could do everything. 
        
"This   painful occupation has God given to the children of men."In other words, we are   to do it but we usually don't know how. And it says here, "to be exercised   therein." To work on it. "I have seen all things that are done under the sun and   behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit." 
        
        So when man sets out,   first with the idea that he is wise enough to discern all things done under the   sun and that he is going to figure them all out, is first in vanity, and vanity   brings vexation of spirit, vexation of the awareness and aggravation. 
        
"The perverse are hard to be corrected and the number of fools is   infinite." 
        
        He was quite sure that he was able to tell "what ought to be"   and so then there were many perverse people. There were many people not doing   "what they ought to do," and he saw an infinite number of fools. Of course,   these all ought to be corrected, shouldn't they? That is vanity.
        
"I have   spoken in my heart, saying (this was long ago while he was a student), Behold, I   am great and have gone beyond all in wisdom that were before me in Jerusalem and   my mind has contemplated many things wisely and I have learned." 
        
        Does   that sound like so many of us - that we have really been able to figure it out?   Does this sound like much that we see, we read in the news, we visit with or we   hear a speech, men who say they have figured it all out; and they know "what   ought to be." If we could just have this utopia, then wouldn't it be so   wonderful? I have learned all these things by my calculations. I might have even   used my computer; and, now then, we know "what ought to be."
        
        Ecclesiastes   continuing says, "I have given my heart to know prudence, learning, errors and   folly." 
        
        He was concerned with opposites, and to be concerned with the   opposites, we must have the ideal. 
        
"I have perceived that in these also   there was labor and vexation of spirit." 
        
        He saw there was nothing but   trouble - always there was second force trying to interfere when one has such   vanity that one thinks one knows what ought to be. 
        
"Because in much   wisdom there is much indignation." 
        
        One gets very angry in one's wisdom   that one knows what ought to be, and others are interfering with it, or they   won't understand it, or I can't convert them to see my viewpoint. So one becomes   very indignant. One expected that all would be greatly delighted for me to tell   them what ought to be and, of course, one is disappointed, one feels hurt, one   looks for blame and finds that the world is full of the perverse and fools. And   one becomes very indignant. 
        
"And he that addeth knowledge, addeth also   labor." 
        
        So the more knowledge he accumulated, the more things he saw   ought to be done. Now, this knowledge is the knowledge of vanity, of learning,   of what ought to be, learning from books, from ideas and from ideologies of what   ought to be.
        
      So further (while he was still a student and on his way   before he became master of the school) he said, 
"I said in my heart (this was in the past) I will go   and abound with delights and enjoy good things." 
          
        I will pursue mammon -   I will gain pleasure and comfort, and I will enjoy all good things. He knows   what is good and he has thought it out to serve mammon, like you and I and all   others. 
        
        "And I saw that this also was vanity." 
        
        He found out that   that was only the thoughts of vanity, thinking I know what ought to be. 
        
        "Later I counted error." 
        
        He knew what ought to be, that one   should never laugh, that one should be a very deadly sober individual because   after all, this was serious business trying to get things like they ought to be. 
        
        "And to mirth I said, why art thou vainly deceived?" 
        
        You see, he   knew what ought to be - that one should never laugh and that anything that one   saw as a peculiar relationship--that one couldn't see the fun in it.
        
        "I   thought in my heart, (this was while he was still a student) to withdraw my   flesh from wine that I might turn my mind to wisdom." 
        
        He was quite   confident that he could know wisdom; and wine, you see, is truth, and he wanted   to turn away from truth and find out for himself. The wine is considered to be   the facts that the school teaches. He thought he could do better while he was   still a student so he would turn to wisdom, which is really vanity that I can   even know what wisdom is.
        
        "...and might avoid folly until I might see   what was profitable for the children of men." 
        
        What they ought to have.   How many of us know what every body else ought to have? So he was going to set   himself up, ignore the teachings, and he was going to find out what was   profitable for the children of men and what they ought to do under the sun. He   was going to find the ideal of all ideals. ..
        
        "all the days of their   lives." 
        
        He knew possibly very much like certain people know today that   one should have a certain forcible education and then that one should have full   employment. One should have a house, clothes, etc., like everybody else, all   equal, and that one fine day he can retire and the state owns all because you   see he wanted to know what they ought to do under the sun all the days of their   lives - from the cradle to the grave, absolute security, you know.
        
        "Now,   I made me great works. I built me houses and planted vineyards. I made gardens   and orchards and set them with trees of all kinds. I made me ponds of water to   water therewith the wood of the young trees.
        
        " He knew what ought to be.   He was building a utopia. And he said, 
        
        "I got me men servants and maid   servants." (He had power over them. He felt very important.) "And I had a great   family and herds of oxen and great flocks of sheep." (Today we would say he had   a great computer, he had a great fleet of trucks, he had great factories, and he   had a great combine - a great group of industries all combined together under   one.) "And above all that were before me in Jerusalem." (And all that was around   about the area in which he lived, he had everything that was needed to be.) "And   I heaped together for myself silver and gold." (He knew what ought to be - to   have security.) "And the wealth of kings and provinces. I made me singing men   and singing women and the delights of the sons of men, cups and vessels to serve   to pour out wine." 
        
        He gained pleasure and escaped pain on all levels and   had power over others; he was having mammon in his early youth as he was a   student and knew more about it and what ought to be. 
        
        "And I surpassed in   riches all that was before me in Jerusalem." (He was top man on the totem-pole.)   "My wisdom also remained with me." (This wisdom of learning that he had gathered   that he knew what ought to be. So he still had it with him and he was still   firmly convinced that he knew what was good and he called that his wisdom.) "And   that whatsoever my eyes desired, I refused them not." (he served mammon.) "And I   withheld not my heart from enjoying every pleasure and delight itself in the   things which I had prepared and esteemed this my portion." (he saw it as this   was man's real purpose - to make use of my own labor.)
      
"..and when I turned myself to all the works that my   hands had wrought and to the labors wherein I had labored in vain." 
          
        Because what had they brought him? Only a little pleasure and   comfort.
        
        He had no spiritual body; he was still asleep serving mammon. 
        
        "I saw in all these things vanity and vexation of mind and that nothing   was lasting under the sun." 
        
        He began to have a little awakening that in   all the things he had put together, he had nothing real--everything he had   accumulated were all things that merely gave him sensations. He did not have any   spiritual body. So here we are listening to a student who had evolved to the   state of being a teacher of one of the great schools, the House of Israel in   Jerusalem, and he found in his effort to depart from the teachings of the school   that he would figure out what ought to be, that he would serve the ideal, he   served the four dual basic urges, and when he looked at it, he saw that it was   vanity, that he had not known what ought to be and that there was nothing   lasting that he had at all. It was all things that would disappear today, and he   had no spiritual body. He wasn't really aware. Then he says, he passed further,   in other words, he began to study a little bit here. 
        
        "I passed further   to behold wisdom and errors in folly." 
      
He began to see that the wisdom he had and the errors   and the folly were all about the same thing. This is the wisdom of the world   that he had - the wisdom that says that we know what ought to be, that we should   build us a utopia and that we should gain pleasure. 
          
        "And I saw that   wisdom excelled folly as much as light differed from darkness." 
        
        He began   to see maybe what really wisdom is - not his wisdom but real Wisdom - the Wisdom   that comes from the teaching that says that one dis-identifies from the self when   one begins to observe. Then he saw the difference that really the wisdom of the   world is folly. It is said in many places, 
        
        "The wisdom of man is as   foolishness with God." 
        
        "What is man, said I, that he can follow the   King, his maker." 
        
        In other words, what is man that he can serve X? He's   beginning to get down to size now. 
        
        "And I saw that wisdom excelled folly   as much as light differed from darkness. The eyes of a wise man are in his head.   The fool walks in darkness." 
        
        The fool thinks that he is very wise, does   he not? Because he knows what ought to be. He is walking in darkness, serving   mammon, but the eyes of a wise man are really in his head; heedful, to observe,   to watch the self. "And I learned that they were to die both alike." 
        
        The   fool and the wise man are to die both alike. You see, the wisdom of man dies and   the fool dies. 
        
        "I," that does not have a spiritual body, is already dead   and so it really has nothing. 
        
        "And I said in my heart..." (now comes the   doubt - that he looked over and he saw something and he said in his heart - he's   going to make an opinion here). "If the death of a fool and mine shall be one,   what doth it avail me that I have applied myself more to the study of wisdom." 
        
        So he says what good does it do me to study the teaching? It looks like   they all die somewhere down the road. You see, he was still being deceived by   the appearance, the appearance of the physical body, and he hadn't quite   discerned as yet that there is a spiritual body, and that the spiritual body is   something real, something lasting and something that doesn't deteriorate. But he   was still deceived by appearances - to see that the physical body, seemingly of   all people, die.
        
        "And speaking with my own mind.." (In other words,   speaking with the conditioning.) "..I perceived that this also was vanity."   Because he had made something valuable. If this person dies physically, and that   one over there dies physically, then the whole thing is vain. There is only that   "I" think "I" know what ought to be - that the one physical body ought to   remain. You see, it is very difficult for man that is observing the physical   form, to conceive that he can get along without it. He doesn't realize that he   can have the possibility of building a spiritual body and that even though the   physical body dies, he can pick it up again. The Messiah demonstrated it - that   it is the real body, the spiritual body, the spiritual frame of reference that   has realness--that can exist forever--and that it can do anything that it likes   with the physical body. It can lay it down. It can pick it up again. If   something injures it or destroys it, it can be repaired very quickly, and it can   be changed in shape, appearance, and anything else because the spiritual body is   there. Without the spiritual body, we are very attached or identified with the   physical body. We do not see that that is X's instrument, and that without a   spiritual body, we are constantly giving false information to X from the self,   and that it operates on it and does destroy it [the physical body].
        
        "And   there should be no remembrance of the wise no more the fool forever. And the   times to come shall cover all things together with oblivion." In other words, it   is important to have attention, to have a physical body, and wasn't it worthless   if he was not going to be remembered and not have attention and approval in the   years to come? 
        
        "The learned dies in like manner as the unlearned and,   therefore, I was weary of my life, and I saw that all things under the sun are   evil, and all are vanity and vexation of spirit." 
        
        Here is the point   where the person might begin to use the teaching. He was beginning to be aware   that he didn't know the purpose of living. He was beginning to question it, he   was beginning to say that even though he had everything, that he was really   weary of the whole bit because he had had it all. He was now in somewhat, you   might say, the state of boredom. He had arisen from somewhere down below in the   states of being, and he was, at least, at boredom and beginning to question the   purpose of living - which is the only time we can truly become the student.   Before then, we have been exposed to the teachings as this man had; and now he   had again.
        
        "And he says again, I hated all my application where if I had   earnestly labored under the sun, being liked to have an heir after me." 
        
        In other words, he had labored and struggled and he really thought that   was pretty much of a waste. What had it all been for? To serve mammon. 
        
        "I know not whether he be a wise man or a fool." 
        
        He had gathered   all of this together and somebody else would take it, and so he didn't know   whether he was a wise man or a fool. 
        
        "And he shall have rule over all of   my labors with which I have labored and been solicitous." 
        
        And is there   anything so vain? Is there anything so false a picture that man thinks that he   has done something worthwhile? Whether he has accumulated a great estate or a   great fortune. He knows not what will happen to it. He thinks he is doing it for   some worthwhile purpose, that he has built something wonderful, but does he   know? Or is that vanity again? He thinks he knew what ought to be.
        
        I   would like for you to take for this week notes on this entire book of   Ecclesiastes. It is written by a teacher who relates his travels from a student,   who didn't see the value in the teachings, to one who saw it. He relates very   much an autobiography of "I", and "I", and "I", of everyone of us who will read   the story. You might read it and change the word from Ecclesiastes to your name,   whatever it may be John, Mary or whatever. Because it is an autobiography. We   may not have been able to gain all the things that Ecclesiastes said he got hold   of, but we've had our cars, our bank accounts, our furniture, our apartment, our   house, our education, our job - all of which would fit the same things as   Ecclesiastes said he had in his, and that he discovered that they were all   vanity, a false picture of self, because the real self was sound asleep and   serving mammon and there wasn't any growth or any waxing in wisdom with a   capital W. You will notice that wisdom is spelled with a little "w" here, lower   case, in other places it is a capital "W." That means that it refers to the   Wisdom that one gains from self-observation and the thing one experiences   here.
        Study the book of Ecclesiastes as though you had written it and instead   of Ecclesiastes it's John or Mary.
        
        [from Marsha....on the way through the   basic several times, I procrastinated doing the exercise he suggests as I didn't   have the version my teacher used at hand. So I am inserting it here. He   primarily used Chapter 2. I wonder how it would be using the whole book?]
___________________________________________________________________________
Lesson 28 – Science of  Man
	    Without Commentary,  additions, or changes to Rhondell’s original talk.
	    Bold Headings added by  transcriber.
	    [Clarifications are  bracketed]
Vanity has been  described as accepting a false picture of self and of one's abilities. Of  course, we all have somewhat of a false picture of our abilities until we  consider them. And then we are constantly suggested that we have these  abilities. And unless one is extremely heedful, extremely capable of paying  attention and sees the necessity of it, one quickly is caught back into vanity  – of believing one has abilities one does not have, such as "I can  walk." And really only X knows how to walk the body. I can report to X  that I want to go to the door and open the door and suddenly we see the walking  and of course, being experiencing it the vanity says, "I am doing  it." Then of course we defend the idea that we are doing it with great  effort. And, of course, that is called pride. 
        
        Now there is a very ancient book called Ecclesiastes that talks much about this  vanity; and we will suggest that for this week you might become acquainted  somewhat with the Book of Ecclesiastes. We will give some reading from it and  some discussion, but looking at it in the light of the Teaching and how it  applies. And we may give some little point about the book.
Ecclesiastes  was said to have been written by a teacher in a school. Now one of the ancient  schools was called the House of Israel. It had several different branches. Then  the House of Israel was followed by the House of Solomon and it had  several branches. And then as the schools died out – each teacher was a little  farther from the original clarity – the school died out and was left with the  ritual. We find it picked up again, the story of this school when the Scribes  and the Pharisees were running it, and the Sadducees, which had turned it into  purely a ritualistic method that they did the ritual, but for no known reason  as to why.
        
        For instance, one of the rituals was "the washing of hands." One  washed one's hands before one ate, representing that one was cleansed of  contamination before handling food. Now this was used to remind, not only for  health reasons and for genteel reasons, but was also as a reminder to remind  one that the mind grasps and therefore is considered to be hands – certain  suggestions, opinions and concepts – and that one was to have the mind, or the  inner being, washed of any contamination of suggestion from that day before one  took ahold of an idea and began to work with it. 
Because ideas that are experimented  with 
        is what builds the spiritual body.
So, these ideas  are raw food; and if they were taken by the hands of the mind that was  contaminated with suggestion, then that food would be contaminated and be  injurious to the spiritual body. 
        
        So as time went on all was forgotten about taking in the spiritual food, the  spiritual ideas, and was only left as a ritual to perform – to wash the hands  before one ate. And of course, the great Messiah tried to point this out in  many different means of even eating without unwashed hands to point out to the  people the parallel that they were taking in contaminated spiritual food  without washing their hands while they were making a great to-do about having  their hands washed before they eat literal food. He told them what came from  without didn’t trample them under or defile them, but arose from within, in the  inner state of man, "the inner hands" that takes in concepts without  checking as to whether one is full of vanity or greed or pride or is still  flitting around with "ideals". In other words, everyday one must  "wash one's hands" before one takes in "food" and the hands  that are referred to, of course, are the spiritual aspect of man that grasps an  idea and begins to either accept it without experimentation because it appeals  to some contamination that has penetrated the mind or the "hands of the  mind" of this day.
  
        Now Ecclesiastes said, starting in about the12th verse, 
  
  "I, Ecclesiastes, was King over Israel in Jerusalem." In  other words, he announces that he was the head of the school of the House of  Israel in the city of Jerusalem. There were other schools, other places, and  somebody else was master over those schools. Now, he's called a King. It's easy  to take those words from master to King, etc. He tells about his growth from  the time of being a student until he was King. Now the fact that he tells what  happens doesn't mean that he was already the King when he started doing this,  but he tells his story of his effort as a student and what he observed. We'll  find that while the words may be somewhat different, the ideas are exactly the  things that we go through with today.
  
        So he starts, "I, Ecclesiastes, was King over Israel in Jerusalem, and  – now this is before he was King over Israel – I proposed in my mind to  seek and search out wisely concerning all things that are done under the  sun." 
  
        Don't we all do that somewhere in our way, possibly when we were in college or  before we got out of college or shortly afterwards or maybe even in high  school? Some of us even earlier decided that we were capable of searching out  all things wisely. We felt that we were already capable of being able to  discern without any self-knowing that which was better done under the sun. We  figured we could do everything. 
  
  "This painful occupation has God given to the children of men." In other words, we are to do it but we usually don't know how. And it says  here, "to be exercised therein" is to work on it. "I  have seen all things that are done under the sun and behold, all is vanity and  vexation of spirit." 
  
        So, when man sets out, first with the idea that he is wise enough to discern  all things done under the sun and that he is going to figure them all out, is  first in vanity, and vanity brings vexation of spirit, vexation of the  awareness, and aggravation. 
  
  "The perverse are hard to be corrected and the number of fools is  infinite." He was quite sure that he was able to tell "what  ought to be" and so then there were many perverse people. There were many  people not doing "what they ought to do," and he saw an infinite  number of fools. Of course, these all ought to be corrected, shouldn't they?  That is vanity.
  
  "I have spoken in my heart, saying,” – this was long ago while he  was a student – “Behold, I am great and have gone beyond all in wisdom that  were before me in Jerusalem and my mind has contemplated many things wisely and  I have learned." 
  
        Does that sound like so many of us, that we have really been able to figure it  out? Does this sound like much that we see, we read in the news, we visit with,  or we hear a speech? Men who say they have figured it all out and they know  "what ought to be." If we could just have this utopia, then wouldn't  it be so wonderful? I have learned all these things by my calculations. I might  have even used my computer; and, now then, we know "what ought to  be."
  
        Ecclesiastes continues and says, "And I have given my heart to know  prudence and learning and errors and folly." He was concerned  with opposites, and to be concerned with opposites we must have the  ideal. 
  
  "And I have perceived that in these also there was labor and vexation  of spirit." He saw there was nothing but trouble – always there  was Second Force trying to interfere when one has such vanity that one thinks  one knows what ought to be. 
  
  "Because in much wisdom there is much indignation." One  gets very angry in one's wisdom that one knows what ought to be and others are  interfering with it, or they won't understand it, or I can't convert them to  see my viewpoint. So, one becomes very indignant. One expected that all would  be greatly delighted for me to tell them what ought to be and, of course, one  is disappointed, one feels hurt, one looks for blame and of course finds that  the world is full of the perverse and fools. And one becomes very  indignant. 
  
  "And he that addeth knowledge, addeth also labor." So,  the more knowledge he accumulated, the more things he saw ought to be done.  Now, this knowledge is the knowledge of vanity, of learning, of what ought to  be, learning from books and from ideas and from ideologies of what ought to be.
  
        So further, while he was still a student and on his way before he became master  of the school, he said, "I said in my heart…” – this was in  the past – “…I will go and abound with delights and enjoy all good  things." I will pursue mammon, I will gain pleasure and comfort,  and I will enjoy all good things. He knows what is good and so he has started  out to serve mammon, like you and I and all others. 
  
  "And I saw that this also was vanity." He found out that  that was only the thoughts of vanity, thinking I know what ought to be. 
  
  "Later I counted error." He knew what ought to be, that one  should never laugh, that one should be a very deadly sober individual because  after all, this was serious business trying to get things like they ought to  be. 
  
  "And to mirth I said, why art thou vainly deceived?" You  see he knew what ought to be, that one should never laugh and that anything  that one saw as a peculiar relationship, that one couldn't see the fun in it.
  
  "I thought in my heart…” – this was while he was still a student –  “…to withdraw my flesh from wine that I might turn my mind to wisdom…" He  was quite confident that he could know wisdom. And wine, you see, is truth, and  he wanted to turn away from truth and find out for himself. The wine is  considered to be the facts that the school teaches. And he thought he could do  better while he was still a student so he would turn to wisdom, which is really  vanity that I can even know what is wisdom. "…and might avoid folly  until I might see what was profitable for the children of men," – what  they ought to have. How many of us know what everybody else ought to have? So,  he was going to set himself up, ignore the Teachings, and he was going to find  out what was profitable for the children of men and what they ought to do under  the sun. He was going to find the ideal of all ideals. "…all the days  of their lives." 
  
        He knew possibly very much like certain people know today that one should have  a certain forcible education and then that one should have full employment. One  should have a house, clothes, etc., like everybody else, all equal, and that  one fine day he can retire and the state owns all because you see he wanted to  know what they ought to do under the sun all the days of their lives – from the  cradle to the grave, absolute security, you know?
  
  "Now, I made me great works. I built me houses and planted vineyards. I  made gardens and orchards and set them with trees of all kinds. I made me ponds  of water to water therewith the wood of the young trees.” He knew what  ought to be. He was building a utopia.  
  
        And he said, "I got me men servants and maid servants." He had  power over them. He felt very important. "And I had a great family and  herds of oxen and great flocks of sheep." Today we would say he had a  great computer, he had a great fleet of trucks, he had great factories, and he  had a great combine - a great group of industries all combined together under  one. "And above all that were before me in Jerusalem." All  that was around about the area in which he lived, he had everything that was  needed to be. 
"And I  heaped together for myself silver and gold." He knew what ought to be – have  security. "And the wealth of kings and provinces. I made me singing men  and singing women and the delights of the sons of men, cups and vessels to  serve to pour out wine." He gained pleasure and escaped pain on  all levels and had power over others; he was having mammon in his early youth  as he was a student and knew more about it and what ought to be. 
        
        "And I surpassed in riches all that was before me in Jerusalem." He was top man on the totem-pole. "My wisdom also remained with  me." This wisdom of learning that he had gathered that he knew what  ought to be. So he still had it with him; he was still firmly convinced that he  knew what was good and he called that his wisdom. "That whatsoever my  eyes desired, I refused them not." He served mammon. "And I  withheld not my heart from enjoying every pleasure and delight itself in the  things which I had prepared and esteemed this my portion." This was  man's real purpose – to make use of my own labor.
"And  when I turned myself to all the works which my hands had wrought and to the  labors wherein I had labored in vain." Because what had they brought him? Only a little  pleasure and comfort. He had no spiritual body; he is still asleep serving  mammon. "I saw in all these things vanity and vexation of mind and  that nothing was lasting under the sun." 
        
        He began to have a little awakening that all the things he had put together, he  had nothing real. They were all things that merely gave him sensations. He did  not have any spiritual body. So here we are listening to a student who had  evolved to the state of being a teacher of one of the great schools, the House  of Israel in Jerusalem, and he found in his effort to depart from the Teachings  of the school and that he would figure out what ought to be, that he would  serve the ideal, he served the Four Dual Basic Urges. And when he got it looked  at, he saw that it was vanity, he hadn’t known what ought to be and that there  was nothing lasting that he had at all. It was all things that would disappear  today, and he had no spiritual body. He wasn't really aware. 
Then he says he  passed further; in other words he began to study a little bit here. "I  passed further to behold wisdom and errors in folly." In other  words, he began to see that the wisdom he had and the errors and the folly were  all about the same thing. So, this is the wisdom of the world that he had – the  wisdom that says we know what ought to be. We should build us a utopia and that  we should gain pleasure. 
        
        "And I saw that wisdom excelled folly as much as light differed from  darkness." He began to see maybe what really wisdom is – not his wisdom but real Wisdom - the Wisdom that comes from the Teaching that  says when one dis-identifies from the self, one begins to observe. Then he saw  the difference that really the wisdom of the world is folly. It is said in many  places, "The wisdom of man is as foolishness with God. 
What is man, said I, that he can follow the King, his maker?" In other words, what is man that he can serve X? He's beginning to get down to size now. "And I saw that wisdom excelled folly as much as light differed from darkness. The eyes of a wise man are in his head. The fool walks in darkness."
And the fool  thinks he is very wise, does he not? Because he knows what ought to be, but  he’s walking in darkness, serving mammon. But the eyes of a wise man are really  in his head, heedful to observe, to watch the self. "And I learned that  they were to die both alike." The fool and the wise man are to  die both alike. You see, the wisdom of man dies and the fool  dies. "I" that doesn’t have a spiritual body is already dead and  so it really has nothing. 
        
        "And I said in my heart..." Now comes the doubt – that he  looked over and he saw something, and he said in his heart… he's going to make  an opinion here. "…if the death of a fool and mine shall be one, what  doth it avail me that I have applied myself more to the study of wisdom?" 
        
        So he says what good does it do me to study the Teaching? It looks like they  all die somewhere down the road. You see he was still being deceived by the  appearance, the appearance of the physical body and he hadn't quite discerned  as yet that there is a spiritual body, and that the spiritual body is something  real, something lasting and something that doesn't deteriorate. But he was  still deceived by appearances – to see that the physical body, seemingly, of  all people dies.
  
  "And speaking with my own mind…" In other words, speaking with  the conditioning. "...I perceived that this also was vanity." Because  he had made something valuable. If this person dies physically, and that one  over there dies physically, then the whole thing is vain. There is only that  "I" think "I" know what ought to be – that the one physical  body ought to remain. You see it’s very difficult for man that is observing the  physical form to conceive that he can get along without it. He doesn't realize  that he can have the possibility of building a spiritual body and that even  though the physical body dies, he can pick it up again. The Messiah  demonstrated it – that it is the real body, the spiritual body, the spiritual  frame of reference that has realness, that can exist forever, and that it can  do anything it likes with the physical body. It can lay it down. It can pick it  up again. If something injures it or destroys it, it can be repaired very  quickly, and it can be changed in shape, appearance, and anything else because  the spiritual body is there. But without the spiritual body we are very  attached or identified with the physical body. We do not see that that is X's  instrument, and that without a spiritual body we are constantly giving false  information to X from the self, and that it operates on it and does destroy it.
  
  "And there shall be no remembrance of the wise no more the fool  forever. And the times to come shall cover all things together with  oblivion." In other words, it is important to have attention, to have  a physical body, and wasn't it worthless if he was not going to be remembered  and not have attention and approval in the years to come? 
  
  "The learned dies in like manner as the unlearned. And, therefore, I  was weary of my life, and I saw that all things under the sun are evil and all  are vanity and vexation of spirit." Here is the point where the  person might begin to use the Teaching. He was beginning to be aware that he  didn't know the purpose of living. He was beginning to question it, he was  beginning to say that even though he had everything, that he was really weary  of the whole bit because he had had it all. He was now in somewhat, you might  say, the state of boredom. He had arisen from somewhere down below in the  states of being, and he was, at least, at boredom and beginning to question the  purpose of living, which is the only time we can truly become the student.  Before then, we have been exposed to Teachings as this man had, and now he had  again.
  
        And he says again, “I hated all my application where if I had earnestly  labored under the sun, being liked to have an heir after me." In  other words, he had labored and struggled, and he really thought that was  pretty much of a waste. What had it all been for? To serve mammon. "I  know not whether he be a wise man or a fool." He had gathered all  this together and somebody else would take it, and so he didn't know if he’d be  a wise man or a fool. 
  
  "And he shall have rule over all of my labors with which I have labored  and been solicitous." And is there anything so vain? Is there  anything so false a picture that man thinks that he has done something  worthwhile? When he has accumulated a great estate or a great fortune he knows  not what will happen to it. He thinks he’s doing it for some worthwhile  purpose, that he has built something wonderful, but does he know? Or is that vanity  again? He thinks he knew what ought to be.
  
        I would like for you to take for this week notes on this entire book of  Ecclesiastes. It is written by a teacher who relates his travels from a student  who didn't see the value in the Teachings, to one who saw it. He relates very  much an autobiography of "I", and "I" and "I" – of  every one of us that will read the story. You might read it and change the word  from Ecclesiastes to your name, whatever it may be – John, Mary, whatever – because  it is an autobiography. We may not have been able to gain all the things that  Ecclesiastes said he got ahold of, but we've had our cars, our bank accounts,  our furniture, our apartment, our house, our education, our job – all of which  would fit the same things as Ecclesiastes said that he had in his, and that he  discovered that they were all vanity, a false picture of self, because the real  self was sound asleep and serving mammon and there wasn't any growth or any  waxing in wisdom with a capital “W.” You will notice that wisdom is spelled  with a little "w" here, lower case, in other places it is a capital  "W." That means that it refers to the Wisdom that one gains from  self-observation and the thing one experiences here.
  
        Study the book  of Ecclesiastes as though you had written it. And instead of Ecclesiastes, it's  John or Mary.
